Tuesday, March 31, 2009

The School of Americas Bites Back

A recent issue of Parade Magazine (March 29, 2009) contains an article entitled “What’s Wrong With Our Prisons?” written by Senator Jim Webb (D. VA) which focuses on two consequences of the drug trade in Mexico and the United States. Curiously, however, just one of the consequences deals directly with our prisons, while the other concerns the enhanced danger to American citizens created by Mexican drug cartels.

First up, Senator Webb tells us that persons imprisoned for drug offenses rose from 10% of the inmate population to about 33% between 1984 and 2002. Moreover, 47.5% of all the drug arrests in our country in 2007 were for marijuana offenses, and nearly 60% of those serving time in state prisons had no history of violence or of any significant drug selling activity. On top of it all, there’s a well-known racial bias built into the system of prosecuting drug offenders in this country in that African-Americans, who comprise about 12% of the U.S. population, account for 37% of those arrested on drug charges, 59% of those convicted, and 74% of drug offenders put in prison.

What this adds up to is that the United States now has the world’s highest incarceration rate, by far. With 5% of the world’s population, we house 25% of the world’s prisoners. We currently imprison 756 inmates per 100,000 residents, more than five times the average worldwide — resulting in the fact that one out of every 31 adults in the US is either in prison, in jail, or on supervised release.

This said, Senator Webb then segues into the second problem — the increase in crime along our southwestern border caused by the traffic in drugs masterminded by Mexican cartels, the profits of which are said to reach $25 billion annually. The cartels, which exert absolute control over certain parts of Mexico and took the lives of more than 6,000 Mexicans last year alone, are also said to be running operations in 230 American cities. With 370 kidnapings last year, they have turned Phoenix, Arizona, into the kidnaping capital of the country, second to Mexico City in the hemisphere. Moreover, according to Senator Webb, the cartels “are known to employ many elite former soldiers who were trained in some of America’s most sophisticated military programs.”

Senator Webb reaches two conclusions which, when combined, create a rather strange tandem. He declares, first, that “we are not protecting our citizens from the increasing danger of criminals who perpetrate violence and intimidation as a way of life,” and, second, that “we are locking up too many people who do not belong in jail.” The remedy for this? The best the Senator can do is: “American ingenuity can discover better ways to deal with the problem of drugs and nonviolent criminal behavior while still minimizing violent crime and large-scale gang activity.”

While I sort of admire Senator Webb, it seems to me that, like a lot of politicians, he’s long on problems and short on solutions. With all due respect, however, when it comes to solutions, partial or otherwise, here are two: First, regarding the drug trade and the high prison population in this country — legalize marijuana, then regulate it and tax it. Second, regarding the involvement of American-trained “elite former soldiers” now working for the Mexican drug cartels, stop training them, Senator — which means closing the School of the Americas where those “elite former soldiers” undoubtedly received their training.

The School of Americas was initially established in Panama in 1946, but was kicked out of that country in 1984 under the terms of the Panama Canal Treaty. In 1984 it was re-established at Fort Benning, Georgia, where, ever since, Latin American security personnel have been trained in combat, counter-insurgency, and counter-narcotics tactics and strategies. The purpose of the School for the most part has been to train “elite” forces which would support American interests by supporting Latin American dictators.

By now it’s clear that graduates of the School of Americas are responsible for some of the worst human rights abuses in Latin America. Among the SOA's nearly 60,000 graduates are notorious dictators Manuel Noriega and Omar Torrijos of Panama, Leopoldo Galtieri and Roberto Viola of Argentina, Juan Velasco Alvarado of Peru, Guillermo Rodriguez of Ecuador, and Hugo Banzer Suarez of Bolivia. Lower level graduates of the School were responsible for the Uraba massacre in Colombia, the El Mozote massacre of 900 civilians in El Salvador, the assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero and the massacre of 14-year-old Celina Ramos, her mother Elba Ramos and six Jesuit priests in El Salvador and hundreds of other human rights abuses.

On November 16, 1989, a US Congressional Task Force issued findings that those responsible for the massacre in El Salvador of the six Jesuits, their co-worker and her teenage daughter were trained at the Army School of the Americas. In a tiny apartment in Fort Benning a year later, the SOA Watch designed to monitor the School of Americas was founded by Father Roy Bourgeois. Father Bourgeois is an American Maryknoll priest, former US Naval officer, and a veteran of the war in Vietnam where he was awarded a Purple Heart. He became a Catholic priest in 1972 and went on to work with the poor of Bolivia for five years before being arrested and forced to leave the country, then under the repressive rule of dictator and SOA graduate General Hugo Banzer. Father Bourgeois had become involved in the US policy in El Salvador years before he started SOA Watch after four US churchwomen — two of them Maryknoll sisters and friends of his — were raped and murdered by Salvadoran soldiers in 1980.

Former Panamanian President Jorge Illueca stated that the School of the Americas was the “biggest base for destabilization in Latin America.” Then Congressman Joseph P. Kennedy II, a supporter of SOA Watch and a friend of Father Bourgeois, said, “the U.S. Army School of the Americas became a school that has run more dictators than any other school in the history of the world." Over the years, the School has produced at least eleven Latin American dictators. In 2001, the Pentagon renamed the SOA the “Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation” (WHISC) because of the bad publicity caused by the SOA Watch which, among other things, had effectively renamed it the “School of Assassins.”

On September 20, 1996, after lying about their existence for years, the Pentagon was compelled to release seven training manuals prepared by the U.S. military and used in Latin America and in intelligence training courses at the SOA between 1987 and 1991. The manuals — one of which was entitled, “Terrorism and the Urban Guerrilla” — taught repressive techniques and promoted the violation of human rights throughout Latin America; they contain instructions in motivation by fear, bounties for enemy dead, false imprisonment, torture, execution, and kidnaping a target's family members. Joseph Kennedy said "These manuals taught tactics that come right out of a Soviet gulag and have no place in civilized society." The Pentagon admitted that they were a "mistake" and were merely the product of an unknown lower-level military operative’s excessive zeal. They had never been “officially cleared for publication” declared the Pentagon, so no one was to blame. Appeals to President Clinton, with the weirdest of logic, were referred back to the Pentagon. The SOA manuals were, in a sense, the moral equivalent of those that would later govern the treatment of prisoners at Abu Gahrib and Guantanamo, and their exposure was treated with similar denial and obfuscation by the military.

Protest demonstrations — which are actually peaceful, nonviolent vigils — are conducted every November by the SOA Watch. Over the years, they have grown considerably; a friend of mine who was there reports that 22,000 persons were at the gates of Fort Benning in 2006. As a result of arrests of SOA Watch protesters, usually for trespassing on a federal military installation or “disturbing the peace,” 237 human rights defenders have collectively spent over 98 years in prison, and more than 50 persons have served probation sentences. The protest held this past November resulted in six more arrests, six more convictions, and six more persons serving time in federal prisons.

To give you a flavor of who does the protesting, the “2008 SOA Six” included Father Luis Barrios, an episcopal priest and college professor who teaches courses on gangs, criminal justice, US-Latin American foreign policy, and Latin Studies at City College of New York; Theresa M. Cusimano, a lawyer and public interest advocate for twenty years from Colorado; Kristin Holm, 21, a first year student at the Lutheran School of Theology in Chicago; Sister Diane Therese Pinchot, of the Ursuline Sisters of Cleveland, a school teacher and sculptress; Al Simmons, 64-year-old retired pre-school teacher and Vietnam vet who has been involved in peace and social justice campaigns “for the past forty years;” and Louis Wolf, 69 years old, a conscientious objector, author, and third-world traveler.

From our area, Kay and Randy Bond have protested the SOA in Fort Benning twice (arrested once), and Sally Neal has been there and done that five times. There may be others. In 2007, Valerie Fillenwarth of Indianapolis, the wife (of 45 years) of a Notre Dame law school classmate of mine, a former Maryknoll sister, the mother of seven and grandmother of 17, served 100 days in the Danbury Correctional Center in Danbury, Connecticut, for trespassing at Fort Benning (a Class B Misdemeanor), though she’d never before received even a traffic ticket. And, of course, Father Bourgeois himself has been imprisoned many times for nonviolent protests at Fort Benning, just as he has been imprisoned many times in many countries throughout Central and South America.

It was only a matter of time, I suppose, that creating a facility like the School of Americas to train soldiers to do the dirty work of American-sponsored dictators south of our borders would result in a situation in which those very soldiers, or others like them, began performing the same kind dirty work for vicious criminal cartels that threaten our own national interests today. The saying may be trite, but it applies: What goes around, comes around.

In 2007, a bill in the US House of Representatives designed to close the School of Americas was defeated by just nine votes, 203 to 214. Representatives Bart Stupak and Dave Camp from northern Michigan voted in favor, and Peter Hoekstra voted against the measure. Overall, with just 76.6% of House Democrats and 11.4% of the Republicans voting in favor two years ago, it’s hoped that a similar bill will pass in the new Congress this year.

By the way, one of the consistent supporters of the effort to close the School of Americas in the United States Congress is Dennis Kucinich. However you may have voted in last year’s primary, Mr. Kucinich has to be the friend of every person in this country who calls him- or herself a liberal.

Anyway, with thanks for his article on the prison problem, as far as it goes, I do have some free advice for Senator Webb — Close the School of Americas, Senator. And have a talk with Dennis. Soon.

Quote of the Day. There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest. — Elie Wiesel

Joke of the Day. How many watched the president’s news conference last Tuesday night? He got a little testy there, you know. When he was asked why he waited three days to speak out against the AIG bonuses, President Obama said he likes to know what he’s talking about before he speaks. So, yet another reversal of the Bush policies. — Jay Leno

9 comments:

  1. Mr. Morse,
    Too much here to itemize the corrections, but let me ask a couple of questions. Can you name even one person who used what he learned at the School of the Americas to commit any crime? Can you show one class or one instructor who taught anything illegal, immoral, or unethical? The answer to those questions is no, because no such evidence exists. Instead of copying SOAW talking points and pasting them in as your work, why don't you do your own research by coming to Fort Benning and evaluating the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation personally. It is easy to do. Fort Benning requires only a photo ID to enter, and WHINSEC is open to visitors every workday. Stay a week or more, if you like. One researcher stayed for a month, working on her doctoral dissertation.
    Sincerely,
    Lee A. Rials
    Public Affairs Officer
    Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for your comment, Mr. Rials. I very much appreciate your interest in how the School of Americas — now know by its more antiseptically official title as the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation — is perceived by the American public.

    As pointed out in my piece on the SOA, I was motivated to write on the subject after reading the Parade Magazine article by Senator Jim Webb, with whom I’m sure you are familiar. A graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, a much-decorated Marine officer and veteran of the Vietnam War, a former Secretary of the Navy, and a member of the U.S. Senate and its Committees on Foreign Affairs, Armed Services, and Veterans Affairs, he has a major military background that is surely to be admired. So let me ask you, Mr. Rials: when Senator Webb writes that “the Mexican drug cartels . . . are known to employ many elite former soldiers who were trained in some of America’s most sophisticated military programs,” to what programs is he referring? He couldn’t possibly be talking about the SOA, could he?

    But more importantly, let me respond briefly to the substance of your comment, which, in all due respect, I find rather thin. No, I have never been in a classroom at the SOA and so I have no first-hand knowledge about what is taught there. No, I have no first-hand knowledge of what any specific student at the SOA learned in any of those classrooms. And no, I have no first-hand knowledge of what any of the many graduates of the SOA may have done with what he learned there later on in any number of Central and South American countries.

    So let me ask you a couple of other questions, Mr. Rials: Do you have any first-hand knowledge of who, specifically, committed the atrocities at El Mozote? Or who, specifically, among right-wing Columbian paramilitaries committed crimes in connection with “Plan Columbia”? Or who, specifically, among the members of a death squad called Battalion 3-16 committed murders in Honduras? Or who, specifically, among military and intelligence units in the regime of Gen. Romeo Lucas Garcia in Guatemala conducted a “scorched earth policy” of murder, rape, and assassination? Or who, specifically, were responsible for the assassination of Salvadoran Archbishop Oscar Romero? Were any of them graduates of the School of Americas? Do you know, first-hand?

    My hunch is that you have no more first-hand information or, as you call it, evidence, that SOA-trained military personnel did not participate in these atrocities than I have of what precisely took place in classrooms at Fort Benning. (Unless, of course, you were actually there.) So, it seems, both of us are pushed back to our “talking points,” as you call them. I have substantiation for my points, and I’ll bet you’ll say you have substantiation for yours. But I find mine are a great deal more credible than yours, which is to say, in all due respect, that I’ll go with Father Roy Bourgeois and the SOA Watch over the public relations office at Fort Benning any day. The problem you have to overcome, Mr. Rials, is that the credibility of much of the U.S. military is currently not the highest, and if you doubt that you haven’t been paying much attention for the past eight years nor are you aware of the history of the SOA Watch.

    In closing, I’m going to set forth a quotation from “Disturbing the Peace,” a book about Father Bourgeois, the SOA Watch, and the SOA by James Hodge and Linda Cooper, one I’m sure you’re familiar with. The question I have for you is this: Do you have evidence — first-hand or otherwise — to refute any of the statements made in the quotation? Here it is:

    “[A]fter the war [in El Salvador] ended in 1992 . . . the U.N. Truth Commission issued its report, which called El Mozote a cold-blooded massacre of civilians. Forensic experts found that of 143 skeletal remains that could be identified from one village building, 131 were children, their average age being six years. Of the 184 cartridge cases with discernable headstamps, all were manufactured in Lake City, Missouri.

    “The U.N. report cited twelve Salvadoran officers for the massacre, the largest in recent Latin American history. . . . [T]en of them were graduates of the U.S. Army School of the Americas, including: [Maj. Natividad de Jesús] Cáceres, who had prodded soldiers to kill children by throwing a baby into the air and impaling it on his bayonet; Army spokesman Col. Alfonso Cotto, who denounced the massacre reports as fabrications of ‘subversives’; Capt. Roberto Alfonso Mendosa Portillo, who’d taken a human rights course at SOA just months before the massacre; and Lt. Col. Domingo Monterrosa, the battalion commander, who later admitted to the slaughter, saying ‘Yeah, we did it . . . . We killed everyone.’” [p. 92]

    The fact of the matter is that, while I was not present at the El Mozote massacre and have not personally read the U.N. report, I happen to find this account entirely credible. To my knowledge, no one has ever repudiated it. It’s a little more, I would say, than mere “talking points.” So, once again, the question: Do you have “evidence,” Mr. Rials, that the statements in this quotation set forth in the book and contained in a report of a United Nations Truth Commission, are not true? If so, is that evidence — and I’m talking here about hard evidence — available for examination without restriction at Fort Benning? If so, perhaps I’ll take you up on your invitation and come and see you.

    Again, thanks for your comment.

    ReplyDelete
  4. i too will await your response mr rials...........can i expect you at my door with SOA literature, just like the watchtower people?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sorry, Ms. Neal, I don't do house calls! Again, I did not suggest that I knew first-hand who committed any crimes, and I certainly don't claim that some people who have attended US training never committed crimes later. The challenge I made was how you can ascribe those crimes to a school these people may have attended at some point in their lives? There simply is no indication that what they were taught in US schools led to any criminal activity. As for Senator Webb's comment, he was specifically referring to a group of deserters from the Mexican Special Forces called Zetas, some of whom, I am told (by a person who was involved in the training, received some training at Fort Bragg, NC. A reporter gave me some of the names, and I could not find any of them in the database of the School of the Americas.

    Again I suggest that if you want to judge an educational facility, you should see what it does and how it does it.

    Lee A. Rials

    ReplyDelete
  6. so Rials......what a cushy job......just sitting at your computer all day, scanning the internet for stuff about you and your SOA........defending the crimes of the school of the asassains with more lies......just like your former commander in chief......how do you look in the mirror..........how do you sleep at nite?........promoting and teaching torture and killing...do you get some kind of high.......never mind....dont answer.....i no longer care of be subjected to your scummy robotic responses.......i hope you find your so called 'school' visited by tens of thousands more people like myself who KNOW what you do there this upcoming november.........

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you, Mr. Rials, for your additional comment. I’m sure it’s not the purpose of either of us to prolong this debate indefinitely, but your statement, somewhat categorical in tone, that in his Parade Magazine article Senator Webb “was specifically referring to a group of deserters from the Mexican Special Forces called Zetas” some of whom, you said, were trained at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, calls for at least one more response from me.

    Admittedly, I do not know much about Los Zetas. That being the case, I did a bit of research — first, at the easiest and most obvious of spots on the internet, Wikipedia — and found this: “Los Zetas is a criminal gang of thugs and murderers that operates as a hired mercenary army for Mexico's Gulf Cartel. The group is mostly composed of ex-soldiers now led by Heriberto "El Lazca" Lazcano. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) advises that these paramilitaries may be the most technologically advanced, sophisticated and violent of paramilitary enforcement groups.”

    Wikipedia also said that the Zetas “were trained by foreign specialists, including Americans, French, and Israelis, in rapid deployment, aerial assaults, marksmanship, ambushes, small-group tactics, intelligence collection, counter-surveillance techniques, prisoner rescues and sophisticated communications.” And then this: “It is believed that they were originally trained at the military School of the Americas in the United States.”

    Similarly, in an article in the New York Times on September 30, 2005, Ginger Thompson referred to an interview of four years ago with Mexican Deputy Attorney General José Luis Santiago Vasconcelos who said that “most of the original members of the Zetas, many of whom had received training at the United States School of the Americas when they were in the Mexican military, had been killed or captured.” Senator Webb might find the statement about wiping out the Zetas a little over-ambitious, but the reference to where they received their training is clear.

    Furthermore, it appears that the Zetas have on occasion allied themselves with other organizations led by SOA graduates. The Foreign Policy Research Center reported, in an article by George W. Grayson in May, 2008, entitled “Los Zetas: the Ruthless Army Spawned by a Mexican Drug Cartel” that Los Zetas had “set up camps in which to train recruits aged 15 to 18 years old, as well as ex-federal, state, and local police officers. In addition, they have invited into their ranks ex-troops from Guatemala known as Kaibiles. Reviled as ‘killing machines,’ these tough-as-nails experts in jungle warfare and counterinsurgency adhere to the motto: ‘If I advance, follow me. If I stop, urge me on. If I retreat, kill me.’“

    Who are the Kaibiles? James Hodge and Linda Cooper, authors of Disturbing the Peace, previously mentioned, refer to Guatemalan General Efraín Ríos Montt, an SOA graduate, who “came to power in a coup with two other graduates, Egberto Horacio Maldonado Schaad and Francisco Gordillo Martínez.” With the assistance of these two, Montt “overthrew still another alumnus [and] shortly after the coup, . . . dissolved the [prior] three-man junta, declared himself president and suspended the constitution.”

    Hodge and Cooper continue: “Ríos Montt, who escalated the scorched-earth campaign, also surrounded himself with SOA graduates, including Eduardo Arévalo Lacs, the commander of the Kaibiles, a counterinsurgency unit that slaughtered more than three hundred inhabitants of Dos Erres, one of the massacres document by the Nunca Más report. The Kaibiles raped women and girls, ripped fetuses from the bodies of pregnant women and killed children by clubbing their heads or bashing them against walls.”

    “Because of their savagery,” the authors conclude, the report of Guatemalan Bishop Juan José Gerardi — entitled Nunca Más (“Never Again”) — “recommended the disbanding of Kaibiles, created by three-time SOA graduate Pablo Nuila Hub.” [p. 180] Unfortunately, presumably at the request if not insistence of the United States, the unit was maintained to assist this country in its “War Against Drugs.”

    Thus we find that a terrorist group that we rescued from the garbage bin to help in the “War Against Drugs” has now “deserted” and gone over to the other side, the Mexican drug cartels. This, of course, brings us full-circle, right back to the problem articulated by Senator Webb in his Parade Magazine article where this debate originated. The fact remains, that much — though surely not all — of that problem originated with the School of Americas. And it is a problem: Mexican President Felipe Calderón has compared Los Zetas to al Qaeda.

    When it comes to fixing the problem, as Senator Webb seems inclined to do, the undeniable fact is that the School of Americas has its fingerprints all over it. So far, your entreaties to the contrary have not stood up under even the most cursory research. As a result, I can only say that, as Public Affairs Officer at the SOA, you’ve certainly got your work cut out for you.



    One final thing, Mr. Rials. On a couple of occasions you have referenced an “open book” policy at Fort Benning and have invited me and others to visit your facility in order to learn all about what really goes on there. You’ve asked why I don’t do my “own research by coming to Fort Benning and evaluating the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation personally,” suggesting “that if you want to judge an educational facility, you should see what it does and how it does it.”

    If that’s the case, Mr. Rials, please explain why, in response to Freedom of Information Act requests, the SOA/WHISC redacts the names and countries of origin of its students, and the classes taken by them. It strikes me and, I think, others who support the SOA Watch that the “book” down there is not quite as “open” as you’ve described it. For if the book isn’t open on the SOA/WHISC, how are we to really “see what it does and how it does it”?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Friends,
    I guess it is impossible to persuade you that perhaps those few people you have named as "SOA graduates" did not develop their character flaws solely from a short association (no reference to the nature of that association) with US training. It also seems impossible to suggest that 'Los Zetas' got their US training at Fort Bragg, even though I referenced a person who actually participated in their training there. Just because this has become an urban myth and has been repeated doesn't make it true. Further, no one has pointed out on that issue what training they received and what it has to do with their choice to become outlaws.
    When I tell you you are welcome to come visit the institute whenever you like, sit in on classes, talk with students and faculty, and review instructional materials, I would hope you would try it out before accusing me of being untruthful. And what does the decision to protect the privacy and security of students and instructors by not publicly releasing lists of their names have to do with openness? How does having such a list help you understand what is taught here and how? Of the previous lists that have been released, not one person has ever been identified as a criminal using them. The sole purpose of SOAW and similar groups is to associate the names of criminals with the school. That's how you get Leopoldo Galtieri listed as a "SOA graduate," although his only attendance was at an Engineer Operations course in 1949, when he was a 23-year-old lieutenant. Do you really think that has relevance to his acts as a general 32 years later?
    Rios Montt has an even more tenuous link to the school; in fact, SOAW doesn't even list him in their 'notorious graduates' listing, but he may be the 'Efrain Rios' who took a cadet course in 1950. Again, relevance of linking his name to US training? I'll let you look up the other names in the SOAW 'graduate database,' and let you find the cause-effect relationship.
    Please don't quote James Hodge to me; he had access to Hugo Chavez, yet never found out that one of the Venezuelan generals who put Mr. Chavez back into power in 2002 was a '93 graduate of SOA's Command and General Staff Officer Course. Hodge was too busy trying to make it appear that the coup was the work of 'SOA grads,' so he didn't want anything upsetting his thesis, especially something like facts.
    To ease Ms. Neal's mind, I wrote most of this during my lunch hour, so I'm not spending all my time on the web.
    Seriously, you are most welcome to come in. All you have to do is get a day pass at the entrance to Fort Benning by showing some form of photo ID. If you are coming, send an email to me at whinsec-pao@conus.army.mil, and I'll send you driving directions to our door.

    Sincerely,
    Lee Rials

    ReplyDelete